I recently located and scanned several conference papers I wrote between 1990 and 1993. The first is particularly special because it justified my first trip of approximately 80 to Australia, where I played a role in making 1:1 personal computing in schools a reality. I was thrilled to have the paper accepted and needed to cut an original 26-page document down to 12 within a few days to make the proceedings. Sadly, I have no idea where the full version is. The paper was written for the

1990 World Conference on Computers in Education, held at the new Darling Harbor Convention Center in Sydney, Australia. Seymour Papert and Alan Kay were two of the conference keynote speakers.

This isn’t my first peer-reviewed academic paper. My first was in 1986.

I will let you be the judge of whether I have maintained any semblance of focus or intellectual consistency over the ensuing decades.

---

I asked Google NotebookLM to create an AI-based discussion of the papers for those of you who find the AI-generated summaries (below) or complete papers TLDR. So, you can listen to Punch & Judy discuss my work if you wish.

Click on the title of any of the papers to view the full text.

---

Developing Scientific Thought in a Logo-Based Environment (1990)

This paper presents Stager’s vision for creating an intellectual laboratory where elementary school students learn the scientific method while developing mathematical thinking and problem-solving skills. He critiques traditional elementary science education as primarily textbook-based memorization of disconnected facts, arguing that students rarely experience authentic scientific inquiry or the “magic of science.” Drawing on Seymour Papert’s concept of “Mathland,” Stager proposes creating a “Scienceland” where students become fluent in scientific thinking through immersion in Logo-based environments that make abstract concepts concrete and personally meaningful.

The paper details three complementary Logo environments: LogoWriter for simulating scientific phenomena and collecting data, LEGO TC Logo for hands-on engineering and physics exploration, and the Phantom Fish Tank for studying cellular automata and artificial life. These tools share common educational themes including emergence of complexity from simple beginnings, child-centered learning, debugging as scientific method, and constructivist knowledge building. Stager demonstrates how these environments can teach concepts like motion, velocity, friction, probability, and artificial life while engaging students in authentic scientific practices of hypothesis formation, experimentation, and conclusion drawing, ultimately transforming students from passive recipients of scientific facts into active constructors of scientific knowledge.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1990). Developing scientific thought in a Logo-based environment. In A. McDougall & C. Dowling (Eds.), Computers in Education: Proceedings of the IFIP TC3 Fifth World Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 809–815). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

---

Towards Constructionism: Ensuring a Comfortable Transition for Teachers – Two Divergent Case Studies (1993)

This paper compares the journey of two schools—A.P. Terhune Elementary School in New Jersey and Methodist Ladies’ College (MLC) in Melbourne—as they transition toward constructionist learning environments. At Terhune, the project faces challenges due to traditions of textbook-driven instruction, centralized authority, and union restrictions. Staff development is therefore critical, with emphasis placed on in-class collaborations and gradual curriculum redesign. In contrast, MLC benefits from a long tradition of innovation, empowering teachers, and wide-scale adoption of personal notebooks, creating fertile ground for constructionist practices.

Despite contextual differences, both schools leverage LogoWriter as a vehicle for intellectual exploration and student expression. Teachers are encouraged to reflect on practice, prioritize inquiry, and support flexible, interdisciplinary learning. Stager highlights how computers serve as catalysts, prompting teachers to reimagine their roles and expectations of students. Success in both cases hinges on teacher appropriation of project goals and their willingness to reshape curriculum and relationships with learners. The paper demonstrates that constructionism can thrive in diverse contexts if teachers are supported through thoughtful professional development.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1993). Towards constructionism: Ensuring a comfortable transition for teachers – Two divergent case studies. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 387–392). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

The Osmosis Myth: A Realistic Approach to Staff Development and Educational Change (1993)

Stager critiques the widespread assumption that educational innovation will “rub off” on teachers through mere exposure to technology—the so-called “osmosis effect.” He argues that superficial staff development (e.g., training teachers in word processing or gradebook software) insults teachers’ intelligence and has little impact on meaningful reform. Instead, professional development must immerse teachers in powerful learning experiences, mirroring the joy and discovery we want for students. He stresses that the real challenge is not technical proficiency but thinking about thinking, reflecting on curriculum, and constructing knowledge collaboratively.

The paper proposes several guidelines for effective practice: concentrate resources on willing innovators (“work with the living”), provide in-class support on teachers’ own turf, create residential institutes where teachers can re-experience learning, and ensure adequate follow-up support. Celebrating teacher initiative and providing sabbaticals for curriculum innovation are also suggested. Stager insists that staff development should be collaborative, reflective, and constructionist, empowering teachers as learners and creators rather than passive recipients of training.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1993). The osmosis myth: A realistic approach to staff development and educational change. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 386–391). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

The Constructionist Mirror (1993)

This collaborative panel paper, featuring Gary Stager, Douglas Clements, Linda Polin, Di Fleming, and Marian Rosen, explores how teachers can reconcile their roles as instructors with their identities as learners. Stager introduces the metaphor of the “constructionist mirror,” reflecting the gap between how teachers see themselves as learners versus how they enact teaching. The panel emphasizes immersion-based institutes and learning-rich contexts where teachers re-experience discovery, collaboration, and reflection, helping them find joy in learning.

Polin draws parallels with Alice’s adventures through the looking glass, describing how teachers must navigate unfamiliar learning environments with curiosity and support. Clements discusses mathematics education, contrasting rote “instrumental” math with relational, conceptual understanding, and how Logo experiences can help teachers reflect critically on mathematics. Fleming describes MLC’s efforts to break teachers free from the “instruction trap” by rekindling curiosity and supporting teacher-student co-learning. Collectively, the panel highlights constructionism as a professional renewal model rooted in teachers’ personal learning.

Reference:
Stager, G. S., Clements, D., Polin, L., Fleming, D., & Rosen, M. (1993). The constructionist mirror: Helping teachers find the learner inside. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 393–398). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

The Challenges and Triumphs of a School with a Notebook Computer per Student (1993)

This case study of Methodist Ladies’ College (MLC) documents the world’s first large-scale laptop initiative, where each student and teacher owned a personal notebook computer. Stager emphasizes that the innovation was not about efficiency or automation but about constructionism—computers as material for thinking, creating, and sharing. Teachers and students alike were immersed in LogoWriter projects that spanned subjects, breaking artificial boundaries between disciplines. Examples include interdisciplinary projects where students integrated mathematics, history, and the arts into rich computer-based explorations.

The initiative profoundly transformed teaching culture at MLC. Teachers were introduced to computing through personal problem-solving in LogoWriter, paralleling the experiences of their students. This shift enabled teachers to respect and empathize with learners’ challenges. Students’ creative work—such as designing equation solvers embedded in animations or programming Mozart sonatas—demonstrated the expressive potential of laptops. The paper concludes that student ownership of personal computers fosters ownership of knowledge, leading to profound curricular and cultural renewal.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1993). The challenges and triumphs of a school with a notebook computer per student. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 399–404). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

“Phil Donahue” and Educational Reform: A Call to Arms (1993)

In this provocative paper, Stager critiques constructionists for confining themselves to academic conferences while instructionist reformers dominate mainstream media. He argues that the constructionist vision of learner-centered, project-based education will remain marginalized unless its advocates engage the public directly—through television, newspapers, school boards, and political forums. He highlights the danger of site-based management being used as a superficial reform without granting communities real authority.

Stager calls for constructionists to champion specific issues, share personal learning stories, and model alternatives that communities can experience firsthand. He urges teachers, parents, and leaders to challenge standardized testing, resist superficial “back-to-basics” policies, and demand equity and diversity in education. Most importantly, he insists that constructionists must “go public” with compelling narratives and media engagement, or risk irrelevance. This is both a critique and a rallying cry for educators to amplify their voices beyond scholarly circles.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1993). “Phil Donahue” and educational reform: A call to arms. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 405–410). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

LESNet: LogoWriter, Telecommunications, and Experimental Science – A Call for Collaborators (1993)

Stager proposes LESNet, a grassroots experimental science network using LogoWriter and telecommunications tools like LogoExpress. Unlike existing online science projects that limit students to predetermined data collection, LESNet envisions a flexible platform where learners can share hypotheses, data, and models in their own voices. By integrating telecommunications with Logo-based environments, students can conduct collaborative science projects that are open-ended, interdisciplinary, and genuinely inquiry-driven.

The paper emphasizes creating meaningful projects for even young children (grades 1–3), such as studying plant growth, weather, or leisure patterns, while fostering geography awareness and scientific habits of mind. LESNet’s design supports constructivist values by prioritizing student-generated questions, collaboration, and the creation of tools rather than consumption of prepackaged software. Stager calls for collaborators to develop curricular units and extend LogoWriter with resources that enable rich scientific exploration across classrooms worldwide.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1993). LESNet – LogoWriter, telecommunications, and experimental science: A call for collaborators. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (p. 512). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

Artificial Life on a Shoestring (1993)

This paper introduces artificial life (A-Life) as an exciting domain for stimulating student inquiry, creativity, and interdisciplinary exploration. Stager shows how LogoWriter, LEGO TC Logo, and the Phantom Fishtank can serve as platforms for students to invent and study new life forms, model animal behaviors, and simulate ecological systems. By creating “life-as-it-could-be,” children engage in authentic scientific practices that foster systems thinking, problem solving, and design fluency.

He illustrates possibilities ranging from modeling mealworm behaviors to inventing new digital creatures with senses, emotions, and social behaviors. Stager draws inspiration from pioneers such as Valentino Braitenberg, Seymour Papert, and Mitch Resnick, emphasizing how students’ playful explorations can yield profound learning about feedback, emergence, and complexity. The paper concludes that A-Life projects are accessible, engaging, and fertile contexts for developing the intellectual tools necessary for 21st-century learning.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1993). Artificial life on a shoestring. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), Rethinking the Roles of Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Technology and Education (pp. 513–518). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

---

Constructing Staff Development and Educational Change (1995)

This paper argues that preparing teachers to use technology meaningfully requires more than computer literacy. Stager critiques superficial staff development programs that reduce teacher training to clerical skills, noting that such approaches rob teachers of the intellectual empowerment students experience with computers. Instead, he emphasizes constructionist staff development rooted in reflection, collaboration, and engaging projects. Using the Australian laptop school movement as a backdrop, he highlights Methodist Ladies’ College (MLC) where every student owns a notebook computer, showing how such environments foster ownership of knowledge and support profound cultural change.

The paper outlines innovative professional development practices such as in-classroom collaboration, “slumber party” retreats, and “build-a-book” programming workshops. These models place teachers in the learner’s role, encouraging reflection, risk-taking, and project-based discovery. Stager stresses that reform requires cultivating cultures of learners where teachers rediscover the joy of learning. He concludes that modern staff development must support teachers in inventing new learning experiences for students, rather than merely adapting old practices to new tools.

Reference:
Stager, G. S. (1995). Constructing staff development and educational change. In D. Tinsley & T. J. van Weert (Eds.), World Conference on Computers in Education VI: Liberating the Learner (pp. 877–886). London: Chapman & Hall.

---

Archived Papers